Who Guards the guards?

 The question of "Who is guarding the guardians?" is a complex one that has been debated for centuries. It is a question that is particularly relevant in a democracy, where the people are supposed to hold their government accountable.

In the United States, there are a number of mechanisms in place to ensure that the guardians are held accountable. These include the following:

• The rule of law: The rule of law is the principle that no one is above the law, not even the government. This means that the government can be held accountable for its actions through the courts.
• Elections: Elections are another way for the people to hold their government accountable. Through elections, the people can choose who they want to represent them in government.
• The media: The media plays an important role in holding the government accountable by reporting on the government's actions and holding it up to scrutiny.
• Civil society: Civil society organizations can also play a role in holding the government accountable by advocating for change and holding protests.

Despite these mechanisms, there are still a number of challenges to holding the guardians accountable. These include:

• The power of the government: The government has a lot of power, and it can be difficult to hold it accountable when it does not want to be held accountable.
• The complexity of government: The government is a complex organization, and it can be difficult to understand how it works and who is responsible for what.
• The apathy of the public: The public can be apathetic about holding the government accountable, and this can make it difficult to bring about change.

Despite these challenges, it is important to continue to strive to hold the guardians accountable. This is essential to maintaining a healthy democracy.

In the context of best interest versus expressed interest, the question of who decides is a difficult one. In some cases, it may be clear what is in someone's best interest, even if they disagree. For example, if someone is suicidal, it may be in their best interest to receive treatment even if they do not want it. However, in other cases, it may be less clear what is in someone's best interest. For example, if someone wants to make a risky decision, it may be difficult to say whether or not that decision is in their best interest.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to follow someone's expressed interest or their best interest is a case-by-case decision that must be made on a individual basis. There is no one-size-fits-all answer.

In the land of the free, there are a number of factors that can influence who decides. These include:

• The age of the individual: In many cases, parents or guardians make decisions for children because children are not considered to be mature enough to make their own decisions.
• The mental capacity of the individual:If an individual is not mentally competent, someone else may need to make decisions on their behalf.
• The law: The law may also play a role in who decides. For example, in some cases, the courts may appoint a guardian to make decisions for someone who is not mentally competent.

Ultimately, the question of who decides in the land of the free is a complex one that depends on a number of factors.